i don't know which is worse...
1) being last on the list... dead, stinking last.
2) getting the book description horribly mucked up.
http://www.publishersweekly.com/article/CA6465832.html
Cities and suburbs, real and imaginary.
Sunday, August 12, 2007
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
![](http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/1597802158?ie=UTF8&tag=httpjmmcdtrip-20&linkCode=as2&camp=1789&creative=390957&creativeASIN=1597802158"><img border="0" src="61QLxt9GgCL._SL160_.jpg"></a><img src="http://www.assoc-amazon.com/e/ir?t=httpjmmcdtrip-20&l=as2&o=1&a=1597802158)
1 comment:
Definitely the latter. They can't control that W is near the end of the alphabet, but they can control what they write. Still, which is worse: Being on Publishers Weekly's list of new trade paperbacks with a poor plot description, or not being on Publishers Weekly's list at all?
Don't let it discourage you though. You're a published author now, that separates you from the rest of the wannabes
Post a Comment